How to Cite

Caring in / for Place: Old Age in Urban Nepal, in Brosius, Christiane and Mandoki, Roberta (Eds.): Caring for Old Age: Perspectives from South Asia, Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing, 2020 (Heidelberg Studies on Transculturality, Volume 8), p. 119–158. https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.597.c8396

License (Chapter)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Identifiers (Book)

ISBN 978-3-947732-94-4 (Hardcover)
ISBN 978-3-947732-95-1 (Softcover)
ISBN 978-3-947732-93-7 (PDF)

Published

04/02/2020

Authors

Christiane Brosius

Caring in / for Place: Old Age in Urban Nepal

Abstract This chapter explores ways to consider, and possibly rethink, elderly people’s positions and forms of participation in urban life in the so-called “Global South,” in this case in Nepal’s Kathmandu Valley. A key question here is how personal relations and experiences of ageing and belonging in a rapidly and widely changing metropolitan region can be addressed and captured. Building upon discussions that evolve around concepts such as “active ageing,” “ageing in place” and “age-friendly cities,” but also around notions such as “public” and “private,” terms largely coined in North America and western Europe, the chapter addresses their produc­tivity—and challenges—when applied in the case of Nepal. It considers a larger field of ageing in the realm of transcultural place-making, since the contextualization includes global circulations of ideas and practices relat­ed to cultural heritage, transnational migration and urban transformation through economic liberalization. The ethnographic material collected be­tween 2014–2016 among senior Newar residents is discussed with respect to questions of ownership, participation, and responsibility. It highlights the entangled relationship of socio-religious relations and built environ­ment, as well as intangible heritage, seeking to stress the importance of ephemeral and interstitial spaces that do not necessarily resonate with ‘global’ concepts of public and private, wellbeing, and development. This way, urban transformation as well as “ageing in place” can be considered as relational.

Keywords age-friendly cities, urban regeneration, elderscapes, cultural heritage, environmental gerontology