How to Cite

Poddar, Prem and Mealor, Cheralyn: Kalimpong as Fiction or Ethnography? Gorkha/Nepali Sensitivities in the Himalayas, in Viehbeck, Markus (Ed.): Transcultural Encounters in the Himalayan Borderlands: Kalimpong as a “Contact Zone”, Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing, 2017 (Heidelberg Studies on Transculturality, Volume 3), p. 321–346. https://doi.org/10.17885/heiup.301.c4118

License (Chapter)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Identifiers (Book)

ISBN 978-3-946054-56-6 (PDF)
ISBN 978-3-946054-58-0 (Softcover)
ISBN 978-3-946054-57-3 (Hardcover)

Published

12/14/2017

Authors

Prem Poddar, Cheralyn Mealor

Kalimpong as Fiction or Ethnography? Gorkha/Nepali Sensitivities in the Himalayas

Abstract Whether produced as an ethnographic account or a fictional narrative, Kalimpong is ultimately subject to the problematics of represen­tation. It is, after all, at the interstices of history, ethnography, literature, and the scientific discourses employed in the service of governmentality, that we find the production of subjectivities, catalogued communities, and an emergent politics of resistance. This essay is an attempt to look at the difficulties in reading/writing this place in the optic of the two traditions of imaginative literature and ethnography, and of a monstration recounted through the prism of a particular novel. Inseparable from this is the ter­minological difficulty inherent in forging Nepali or Gorkha identity. This is evident in the production of rather unwieldy devices indicative of some distance from the historical homeland of Nepal in the form of lexicons such as Indian-Nepali, नेपामुल भारतीय (Nepamul Bharatiya), भारतीय-गोर्खाली (Bharatiya-Gorkhali) or भरगोली (Bhargoli). Gorkhaness has increasingly become synonymous with Indian Nepaliness, but only invests in degrees of differential commonalities with Nepaleseness and diasporic Nepalese­ness. While this counters the irredentism of a Greater Nepal thesis, it can­not completely exorcise the seductive spectres of ethnic absolutism for diasporic subjects. Rather than just looking at the work of “Nepali” writers who narrate Gorkha subjectivity as it attempts to relocate itself within the matrix of the Indian nation, riddled as it is by ethno-nationalist demands, including the continuing cry for a Gorkhaland, this essay instead focuses on the question of reading/writing (itself a practice) in Kiran Desai’s Book­er winning The Inheritance of Loss, a novel which, penned by a dialogically cosmopolitan writer, became notorious for its narration of a post-1980s Kalimpong in flux.