How to Cite
License (Chapter)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Identifiers (Book)
Published
Fake News über das Morgen von gestern?
Kontroversen über die Astrologie im späten Mittelalter
Abstract This paper focuses on the example of late medieval controversies about astrology in order to ask whether the concept of ‘Fake News’ can be made fertile for medieval studies. On the basis of selected texts from the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, it analyses the argumentative strategies of proponents of astrology and their adversaries. A particular focus lies on the late French royal court during the reign of Charles V, when Nicole Oresme repeatedly published texts against the influence of astrology. In his vernacular ‘Livre de divinacions’, Oresme mobilized not only scientific, logical, and theological arguments, thereby characterising astrology as an illegitimate and ineffective means to produce knowledge about the future: in addition, he used ad personam arguments that served to denounce (unidentified) astrologers as frauds. In the broader context of this volume, this example demonstrates, how the accusation to produce wrong ‘truths’ could be used by opponents of astrology in order to delegitimise their adversaries.
Keywords astrology; fake news; Nicole Oresme; France

