https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/transcultural/issue/feedThe Journal of Transcultural Studies2025-03-07T14:57:58+01:00Editiorial Team / Redaktionjts-editors@hcts.uni-heidelberg.deOpen Journal Systems<p><em>The Journal of Transcultural Studies</em> is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal committed to promoting the knowledge and research of transculturality in all disciplines. It is published by the Heidelberg Center for Transcultural Studies (HCTS) at Heidelberg University.</p>https://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/transcultural/article/view/25087The Jewish Mahallah of Singapore as a Site of Transcultural Memory2025-01-20T11:31:07+01:00Jay ProsserJ.D.Prosser@leeds.ac.uk<p>The Jewish quarter in Singapore, from the 1870s until the 1960s, was known by its residents<br />as the <em>mahallah</em>. From the Arabic for “stopping place,” the term and many of the cultural<br />practices of its residents were transported to Singapore from the Middle East, mostly from the<br />Ottoman Empire, specifically Iraq, as Jews migrated from this region to Singapore. Drawing<br />predominantly on oral histories of Singapore Jews, this essay establishes how the Singapore<br /><em>mahallah</em> was shaped by transcultural memory. Never appearing on a map, the <em>mahallah</em> did<br />not conform to the racial divisions expressed by British imperialist Singapore in the Jackson<br />(or Raffles Town) Plan. However, I show how the <em>mahallah</em> disintegrated, as the Singapore<br />Jewish community divided along the lines of class and racial identification informed by<br />British imperialism. The <em>mahallah</em> is now wholly memorialized, in the oral histories, in<br />memoirs, a novel, and the Jews of Singapore Museum, rather than a vital Jewish quarter.</p>2025-03-07T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2025 The Journal of Transcultural Studieshttps://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/transcultural/article/view/25090The Transformations of a Deity: Tracing the Impact of Transcultural Exchanges on Enoshima Island in Japan through the Prism of the Deity Benzaiten2025-01-28T00:15:56+01:00Alexander Veseyavesey@k.meijigakuin.ac.jp<p>Travel guides, web blogs, and other forms of modern media often praise the buildings, gardens, and artwork of Japanese Buddhist temples and Shinto shrines as exemplars of traditional Japanese cultural practices and values. This interpretation situates these sites within a Japanese cultural milieu, but aside from references to Buddhism’s Indian origins or the Chinese abbots of a particular monastery, less attention is given to defining their identities within global cultural exchanges and negotiations. This paper applies insights from transcultural studies to the history of Japan’s Enoshima Island and Benzaiten, a water-culture deity long venerated at the island’s shrines, in order to analyze the impact of inbound cultural flows on the creation and subsequent evolution of the Benzaiten cult and the island’s economic development. This study also examines how the product of these exchanges (new interpretations of Benzaiten and Enoshima) are interjected back into global cultural flows via tourism and mass media.</p>2025-03-07T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2025 The Journal of Transcultural Studieshttps://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/transcultural/article/view/25089Imagined Civilization: Identity and Nation Building in Modern China2025-01-20T11:45:34+01:00Ori Selaosela@tauex.tau.ac.il<p>This paper analyzes the journey of the modern concept of “civilization” from the West into<br>China, via Japan. It traces how Chinese intellectuals at the turn of the twentieth century used the<br>term and the consequences thereof, through the prism of the proclaimed need to construct a<br>modern nation, state, and society while negotiating the tensions between “old” and “new.” I<br>argue that their ideas and imaginaries of civilization were highly significant in shaping national<br>identity, theories, and practices and were consequential at the individual level as well. The essay<br>also follows the ways in which civilization, as a term and concept, traveled from the 1920s to the<br>contemporary People’s Republic of China (PRC). It shows how the concept lost its appeal in the<br>Maoist era but bounced back in the post-Mao years, particularly over the past decade. I discuss<br>the current uses and understandings of civilization under the leadership of Xi Jinping, and<br>examine how century-old notions have been transformed. More specifically, the essay argues<br>that the relationship between “civilization” and the “nation” changed dramatically and that these<br>terms acquired new meanings with the changing global context, therefore serving different ends<br>internally and externally. Presentist accounts often ignore the rich conceptual base on which<br>newer ideas develop, therefore overlooking not only alternative ways of understanding but also<br>the deeper context of current developments; the article aims to serve as a corrective to such<br>accounts by highlighting the historical trajectory and links of the past usage of a concept to its<br>present.</p>2025-03-07T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2025 The Journal of Transcultural Studieshttps://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/transcultural/article/view/25088Postcolonial Theory of Science and Other Knowledge Forms: The Engagement with Cognitive and Epistemic Justice2025-01-20T11:32:51+01:00Dhruv Rainadhruv@mail.jnu.ac.in<p><span lang="EN-IN">The essay addresses concerns about the history and philosophy of science that emanate from the current discussions on the ideas of epistemic justice, cognitive justice, and epistemologies of the Global South. These discussions are salient for the raging debate on the </span>decolonization<span lang="EN-IN"> of minds, knowledge, and the university. We therefore need to address their consequences for the history and philosophy of science, seen here not as distinct formations but as a unitary whole customarily referred to by the acronym HPS. This paper is a preliminary step in that direction. In the first two sections, the essay provides a sketch of Eurocentric diffusionist models in the history of sciences and critiques of histories of science in the non-West based on such models that emanated from India. The latter half of the paper an exegetic effort to tease out the meanings associated with cognitive justice, and deliberates upon the philosophical consequences resulting from diverse readings of epistemologies of the Global South for the pursuit of the history and philosophy of science. Can these concepts be woven into a more just account of the global history and philosophy of the sciences?</span></p>2025-03-07T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2025 The Journal of Transcultural Studieshttps://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/transcultural/article/view/25111Cover and Front Matter2025-02-27T16:47:02+01:00Sophie Florencesophie.florence@hcts.uni-heidelberg.de2025-03-07T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2025 The Journal of Transcultural Studieshttps://heiup.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/transcultural/article/view/25112Editorial Note2025-02-27T16:49:22+01:00Monica Junejajuneja@hcts.uni-heidelberg.deJoachim KurtzKurtz@hcts.uni-heidelberg.deMichael Radichmichael.radich@hcts.uni-heidelberg.de2025-03-07T00:00:00+01:00Copyright (c) 2025 The Journal of Transcultural Studies